Pick one: Icom, Kenwood, Yaesu -- who rules?
Moderator: Global Moderator Team
-
- 2135
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:26 pm
Pick one: Icom, Kenwood, Yaesu -- who rules?
Outta the big three -- if ya had to depend on a rig to get ya through -- who'd ya favor?
-
- 2135
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 8:56 am
- Location: Near Lansing, Mi
- Contact:
-
- Moderator - Dayton 2006/2007 Supporter
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 7:37 pm
- Location: 3.865
Icom customer support and turn around time is excellent, Sent my 706 in for blown finals cost me $75.00 was back in 2 weeks from the factory.
Ten-Tec has outstanding customer support also.I needed a dial string for my old analog transceiver last year,and the sent me one free of charge.
Yaesu customer support is slow to respond on repairs turn around time sucks.
Never had to send a Kenwood back for repairs........So whats that tell you? hammertime
Kenwood all the way![THE BABY! :baby:](./images/smilies/smileybaby.gif)
Ten-Tec has outstanding customer support also.I needed a dial string for my old analog transceiver last year,and the sent me one free of charge.
Yaesu customer support is slow to respond on repairs turn around time sucks.
Never had to send a Kenwood back for repairs........So whats that tell you? hammertime
Kenwood all the way
![THE BABY! :baby:](./images/smilies/smileybaby.gif)
The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" --Winston Churchill
Rules?
Hello.
Customer support.
Yaesu and Motorola both suck!
Icom, Kenwood, M/A-Com, all OK.
Thales, depends on the country, even on the same product.
Quality.
Motorola, M/A-Com and Thales build excellent products.
Icom, Kenwood, Yaesu, all are OK, but for the most part, not in the same league, even the commercial products, as the above 3.
Ease of use.
The current crop of M/A-Com radios seem to have the best menu arrangement of all of the radios so far, followed by the Motorola XTS-5000 series.
The radios I like to carry.
The most common radio I carry is the Kenwood TH-f6/7a/e radio.
Yes, it is a hamster radio, but it can do 136 MHz to 490 MHz with no real issues, is small enough to be easily carried, and is cheap.
The next most common is the Yaesu VX-7r.
This radio is MUCH easier to mod for out of band operation, is somewhat waterproof, and, also somewhat inexpensive.
I was carrying the Thales tactical radio right up to a few weeks ago.
Totally awsome, really broad band multi mode radio.
This is THE radio if you want to do any kind of crypto whatsoever.
The Thales radio is totally software driven, so it is simply a command to flush both the codefill and the codeplug, but not all is lost.
Thales provides a recovery disk for that radio, and only that radio, that can restore all the factory defaults.
When is Motorola, or, for that matter, anyone else, coming up with that?
AM and FM are the order of the day, with coverage of 25 MHz to 550 MHz (US models do 30 MHz to 512 MHz).
Selectivity is OK, but the front end can easily overload in a high RF environment.
The radio will work from around 7 volts to 32 volts with no issues.
Price? around 7G.
Customer support.
Yaesu and Motorola both suck!
Icom, Kenwood, M/A-Com, all OK.
Thales, depends on the country, even on the same product.
Quality.
Motorola, M/A-Com and Thales build excellent products.
Icom, Kenwood, Yaesu, all are OK, but for the most part, not in the same league, even the commercial products, as the above 3.
Ease of use.
The current crop of M/A-Com radios seem to have the best menu arrangement of all of the radios so far, followed by the Motorola XTS-5000 series.
The radios I like to carry.
The most common radio I carry is the Kenwood TH-f6/7a/e radio.
Yes, it is a hamster radio, but it can do 136 MHz to 490 MHz with no real issues, is small enough to be easily carried, and is cheap.
The next most common is the Yaesu VX-7r.
This radio is MUCH easier to mod for out of band operation, is somewhat waterproof, and, also somewhat inexpensive.
I was carrying the Thales tactical radio right up to a few weeks ago.
Totally awsome, really broad band multi mode radio.
This is THE radio if you want to do any kind of crypto whatsoever.
The Thales radio is totally software driven, so it is simply a command to flush both the codefill and the codeplug, but not all is lost.
Thales provides a recovery disk for that radio, and only that radio, that can restore all the factory defaults.
When is Motorola, or, for that matter, anyone else, coming up with that?
AM and FM are the order of the day, with coverage of 25 MHz to 550 MHz (US models do 30 MHz to 512 MHz).
Selectivity is OK, but the front end can easily overload in a high RF environment.
The radio will work from around 7 volts to 32 volts with no issues.
Price? around 7G.
-
- 2135
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:26 pm
Interestind replies so far -- I purposely left out SGC and Ten Tec since they are smaller players in the market, but Ten Tec definately deserves their reputation as a customer service leader in the industry -- not to mention their radios are great -- although some think they are not to "modern" looking.
Back to the topic -- in my experience, Yaesu's seem the most-innovative in design and menu selections -- but they tend to put a lot of lemons in the crop -- and I have had several Yaesu lemons and lost my hat on the rig because I did not and would not re-sell a POS to a ham -- Yaesu warranty service really blew too -- in terms of time spent at the factory and whether or not the rig was properly fixed (if they even admitted it had a problem).
I think Kenwood is a pseudo-player anymore -- they seem to be getting their commercial division in top shape -- the ham stuff -- yeah -- some HF stuff and some HTs seem to have slowed a little - although I like the new ti band HT but have heard some poor reports (the one with 220).
Icom -- well -- what can I say -- I love 'em -- and would trust their HTs if I needed an all round dependable rig to get me through -- same goes with their HF stuff.
If you could take the design of Yaesu, the ruggedness of an Icom and the dependability of a Kenwood you'd have a pretty good rig!
Back to the topic -- in my experience, Yaesu's seem the most-innovative in design and menu selections -- but they tend to put a lot of lemons in the crop -- and I have had several Yaesu lemons and lost my hat on the rig because I did not and would not re-sell a POS to a ham -- Yaesu warranty service really blew too -- in terms of time spent at the factory and whether or not the rig was properly fixed (if they even admitted it had a problem).
I think Kenwood is a pseudo-player anymore -- they seem to be getting their commercial division in top shape -- the ham stuff -- yeah -- some HF stuff and some HTs seem to have slowed a little - although I like the new ti band HT but have heard some poor reports (the one with 220).
Icom -- well -- what can I say -- I love 'em -- and would trust their HTs if I needed an all round dependable rig to get me through -- same goes with their HF stuff.
If you could take the design of Yaesu, the ruggedness of an Icom and the dependability of a Kenwood you'd have a pretty good rig!
I've only owned Yaesu stuff, but both vx-5rs and the ft-817 have been well behaved. The 5rs have proven to be durable - dropped one on the floor and street a few times. It is scuffed up but still works great.
I'm not sure if this is a bug in the 817 or what, but a local 440 repeater won't hear me, even with the correct tone and squelch settings. Both 5rs hit the same repeater just fine. All the other repeaters can hear the 817 just fine...
I'm not sure if this is a bug in the 817 or what, but a local 440 repeater won't hear me, even with the correct tone and squelch settings. Both 5rs hit the same repeater just fine. All the other repeaters can hear the 817 just fine...
No static at all...
-
- 2135
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:37 am
- TiNy
- DAYTON 2005/2006 SUPPORTER
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:49 pm
- Location: It's wonderful to be here in the great state of Chicago.
Well, I happen to like Kenwood for almost all my stuff
I have had bad luck with Yeasu HT's
3 ft-60r's bad out of the box
Icom 207 and 2100 well not enough space to type all the problems
so far nevar had a problem with Kenwood I have a F6A and a 780
but i do have Yahoo Ft8900 in the truck which I am thinking of getting rid of just cause I do not use it....
I have had bad luck with Yeasu HT's
3 ft-60r's bad out of the box
Icom 207 and 2100 well not enough space to type all the problems
![THE BABY! :baby:](./images/smilies/smileybaby.gif)
so far nevar had a problem with Kenwood I have a F6A and a 780
but i do have Yahoo Ft8900 in the truck which I am thinking of getting rid of just cause I do not use it....
I use an Alinco for HF eh
My Yeasu VX-5R is awesome, I take it with me everywhere, including work(I work in construction) and I beat the crap out of it, it still works fine.
I have an old Kenwood TR-9130 2m all mode that kicks azz for ssb weak signal work .
I used to have an Icom 2m/70cm dual band mobile that was irritatingly susceptible to intermod.
My mobile rig in my Jeep is also an Alinco ( DR-510 dual bander) that I got for $40 , it works OK.
Bottom line , I give the nod to Yeasu and Kenwood.
My Yeasu VX-5R is awesome, I take it with me everywhere, including work(I work in construction) and I beat the crap out of it, it still works fine.
I have an old Kenwood TR-9130 2m all mode that kicks azz for ssb weak signal work .
I used to have an Icom 2m/70cm dual band mobile that was irritatingly susceptible to intermod.
My mobile rig in my Jeep is also an Alinco ( DR-510 dual bander) that I got for $40 , it works OK.
Bottom line , I give the nod to Yeasu and Kenwood.
"No one here gets out alive" J.Morrison
- BlakJak
- 98245C-001400-5
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Contact:
My Yaesu FT8900R is great.
My FT50 is 'Ok'.
No problems with Y aesu.
The older Kenwood mobiles (TM-731/2/3) were pretty good, dont know about their current stuff.
Icom HF gear seems pretty good, I looked seriously at a 706 but ran out of $$
My FT50 is 'Ok'.
No problems with Y aesu.
The older Kenwood mobiles (TM-731/2/3) were pretty good, dont know about their current stuff.
Icom HF gear seems pretty good, I looked seriously at a 706 but ran out of $$
de ZL1VMF, Auckland, New Zealand.
http://www.blakjak.net
http://www.blakjak.net
ICOM MIC"S mostly suck
ICOM should try somthig radical. like build a good mic. cheap garbage network cable conectors. micro switchs that come off the boards. ptt"s that stick. i suppose it is ok for a base type application, not durable for a mobile. god i hate the plastic snap mic connectors. what are they called anyway. and why did every one go to that style?????
you do realize, you could find someone easily to help you and program your radiosPBR wrote:I have owned Icom, Alinco and Yaesu. If I had to choose only one it would be Yaesu. best combo of price, performance and durability.
Now if Moto was easier to program I would chuck them all for /\/\ but I will be damned if I am going to pay more for the software than i did for the radio (used)
N3JFW 4:29 pm
(4:29:48 PM): so he's gay huh
(nameless ham) 4:30 pm
(4:30:02 PM): haha no, but he is a music major
N3JFW 4:30 pm
(4:30:15 PM): so he's still in the closet
(4:29:48 PM): so he's gay huh
(nameless ham) 4:30 pm
(4:30:02 PM): haha no, but he is a music major
N3JFW 4:30 pm
(4:30:15 PM): so he's still in the closet
- k3who
- EXTERMINATE!! EXTERMINATE!!
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:16 am
- Location: Central PA
When it comes to hammy HT's I have to say that my Yaesu 170 is easily the best one I've ever owned when it comes to quality and features. I've seen the VX-150's and VX-7's as well and they appear to be excellent quality for ham HT's.
When it comes to mobiles, I've also found Yaesu to be the best quality compared to other models I've seen by other companies.
When it comes to HF I can't really say cuz I haven't seen and used that many HF rigs to really compare. Most folks I know are either die hard on Yaesu or Icom though when it comes to HF. A buddy of mine has an ICOM 756 Pro III and I will say if I had the money that'd probably be the rig I'd pick up though.
When it comes to mobiles, I've also found Yaesu to be the best quality compared to other models I've seen by other companies.
When it comes to HF I can't really say cuz I haven't seen and used that many HF rigs to really compare. Most folks I know are either die hard on Yaesu or Icom though when it comes to HF. A buddy of mine has an ICOM 756 Pro III and I will say if I had the money that'd probably be the rig I'd pick up though.
How?n3jfw wrote:you do realize, you could find someone easily to help you and program your radiosPBR wrote:I have owned Icom, Alinco and Yaesu. If I had to choose only one it would be Yaesu. best combo of price, performance and durability.
Now if Moto was easier to program I would chuck them all for /\/\ but I will be damned if I am going to pay more for the software than i did for the radio (used)
The local radio shops charge $40 to $100 to program depending on how many channels.n3jfw wrote:you do realize, you could find someone easily to help you and program your radiosPBR wrote:I have owned Icom, Alinco and Yaesu. If I had to choose only one it would be Yaesu. best combo of price, performance and durability.
Now if Moto was easier to program I would chuck them all for /\/\ but I will be damned if I am going to pay more for the software than i did for the radio (used)
$100 to program my UHF Spectra every time somebody changes a PL, goes to DPL or goes from + offset to - on the repeaters I use is an expensive pain in the ass.
Icom for HF
Kenwood for V/UHF hammy toy radios, /\/\otorola for radios when it really matters.
Yaesu sucks, but I like the portables after the FT530.
I used to work for the Yaesu Eastern Service Center and swore that I'd never ever buy another piece of Yaesu crap, but I ended up buying an FT50 (used, so I did not feel so bad). Yes, I used to work on that crap.
Kenwood for V/UHF hammy toy radios, /\/\otorola for radios when it really matters.
Yaesu sucks, but I like the portables after the FT530.
I used to work for the Yaesu Eastern Service Center and swore that I'd never ever buy another piece of Yaesu crap, but I ended up buying an FT50 (used, so I did not feel so bad). Yes, I used to work on that crap.
Specialty Printing. TShirts, Golf Shirts, Coffee Mugs and more...
www.jerichoprints.com
www.jerichoprints.com
- BlakJak
- 98245C-001400-5
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:01 am
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Contact:
I actually always liked the FT-530.
A mate of mine - blind - had one. The tones meant he knew what buttons he was pushing...
A mate of mine - blind - had one. The tones meant he knew what buttons he was pushing...
de ZL1VMF, Auckland, New Zealand.
http://www.blakjak.net
http://www.blakjak.net
- KC9UZB
- 98247E-011480-1
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:10 am
- Location: Artist formerly known as M3ECM (Indiana)
OLD style Kenwood, from the late 80's early 90s for me. Built like a tank, unbreakable. HF/V/UHF.
For some reason I have two Yaesu FT-8800's. They're good and everything, but you know if you look at them funny they'd fall apart... crossband repeat is fun ;)
Icom - I love their scanners, but I've never really played with their transceivers much. My mate has 5 Icom handhelds, two FT-8900's and an FT-8800.
Since I became a Motosnob, I'm selling up all my hammy gear (apart from one of my FT-8800's) and buy Moto stuff tbh.
For some reason I have two Yaesu FT-8800's. They're good and everything, but you know if you look at them funny they'd fall apart... crossband repeat is fun ;)
Icom - I love their scanners, but I've never really played with their transceivers much. My mate has 5 Icom handhelds, two FT-8900's and an FT-8800.
Since I became a Motosnob, I'm selling up all my hammy gear (apart from one of my FT-8800's) and buy Moto stuff tbh.